Description
First submission is that it was unfair of the crown to subhect the recording of the appellants interview to expert analysis and comparison with the tape recordings of the telephone calls to the complainer. This was because prior to the interview the appellant was not told that anything he said might be subjected to analysis and comparison. The case also concerns additional evidence and whether is should be allowed in terms of section 106 of the
Criminal Law (Consolidation)(Scotland) Act 1995.